Which Networks Does MetaMask Support? Understanding EVM and Non-EVM Blockchains
- Сергей Клещов
- Dec 29, 2025
- 3 min read
As organizations and individual users begin working with decentralized applications and digital asset infrastructure, understanding how blockchain networks function inside a crypto wallet becomes essential. MetaMask, one of the most widely used non-custodial wallets, supports a broad set of blockchains — but only those built on Ethereum’s architecture. This creates an important distinction between EVM-compatible and non-EVM networks and shapes how users interact with decentralized applications, smart contracts, and Web3 tools.
Below is an overview of how network compatibility works in MetaMask, why some blockchains are supported while others are not, and what businesses should keep in mind when building or using multi-network digital asset solutions.
EVM-Compatible Networks: What MetaMask Supports by Default
MetaMask is designed to operate with blockchains built on the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). These blockchains share the same wallet address format, smart-contract execution logic, and development standards, making it possible to use MetaMask across multiple ecosystems.
Examples of EVM networks supported by MetaMask include:
Other EVM sidechains and Layer-2 solutions
These networks allow seamless interaction with decentralized applications (dApps), token development platforms, and decentralized finance (DeFi) tools created with standard Solidity-based smart contracts.
MetaMask displays only a few networks by default, but dozens more can be added manually or through automated tools.
Adding Networks: Built-In Options and Chainlist Integration
When selecting “Add Network” in MetaMask, users see a curated list of EVM chains. However, many Web3 engineering and blockchain development tools rely on additional networks that do not appear by default.
To add any supported EVM chain, users can:
Open the “Add Network” section inside MetaMask
Select from the available list
Or use Chainlist, a trusted network registry that allows one-click addition of EVM-compatible chains
Chainlist:
Businesses working with multi-chain decentralized applications frequently use Chainlist to streamline deployment and testing across several networks.
Non-EVM Networks: Why MetaMask Cannot Support Them
Not all blockchains follow Ethereum’s architecture. MetaMask does not support networks that use different virtual machines, transaction models, or cryptographic standards.
Networks not compatible with MetaMask include:
Bitcoin — operates on its own UTXO-based architecture
Solana — uses the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM)
TON — operates on its own execution environment
Cardano, Cosmos, Near, Algorand, and others
To interact with these networks, users must install dedicated wallets or advanced multi-chain wallets that natively support both EVM and non-EVM blockchains.
This distinction is important for businesses planning digital asset infrastructure, cross-chain platforms, token engineering, or smart-contract audit activities across different ecosystems.
Different Networks, Different Fee Tokens
Although EVM networks share a common structure, they differ in the tokens used for transaction fees:
Ethereum → ETH
Arbitrum → ETH
Base → ETH
Blast → ETH
Avalanche → AVAX
Polygon → MATIC
BNB Smart Chain → BNB
Understanding fee structures is crucial when designing decentralized applications or integrating multi-chain user flows in Web3 products.
Network Address Consistency Across EVM Chains
Inside a single MetaMask account, the wallet address remains the same across all EVM networks. This simplifies interaction with decentralized applications, smart-contract platforms, token development tools, and cross-chain infrastructure.
Even though the address stays identical, the network context changes:
Token balances differ per network
Fees must be paid in the native token of the selected chain
Smart contracts deployed on one network do not exist on another unless redeployed
This makes accurate network selection essential when sending assets or interacting with decentralized applications.
Why Businesses Use Multiple Networks
Different blockchains offer different advantages:
Ethereum — security, liquidity, established smart-contract standards
Arbitrum, Optimism, Base — fast and low-cost Layer-2 execution
Polygon — low-fee environment for high-volume transactions
Avalanche — fast finality and enterprise-friendly architecture
BNB Smart Chain — extensive retail and developer adoption
Web3 engineering teams, smart-contract auditors, and blockchain developers often leverage multiple networks to optimize performance, reduce costs, and reach wider user bases.
MetaMask and Transaction Fees
Ethereum remains one of the most expensive blockchains for transactions:
Typical fee: $3–$15 per transaction
In comparison, other EVM networks offer significantly lower fees:
Arbitrum: $0.01
Base: $0.01–0.02
Avalanche: $0.15–0.20
Polygon: ~$0.05
Businesses and individual users often choose alternative EVM networks to reduce operational costs while maintaining compatibility with Ethereum-based smart contracts.
Conclusion
MetaMask’s support for EVM-compatible networks enables seamless interaction with a large portion of today’s decentralized applications, smart-contract platforms, and blockchain development tools. While non-EVM blockchains require separate wallets, the wide availability of EVM networks in MetaMask provides flexibility, scalability, and broad access to the Web3 ecosystem.
In upcoming materials, we will explore how to purchase cryptocurrency on centralized exchanges, how P2P marketplaces work, and how to withdraw digital assets across different networks safely and efficiently.
These materials are created for information only and do not constitute financial advice.
Comments